Editing Japan Tobacco International

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 652: Line 652:
 
New research co-authored by University of Bath details tax avoidance tactics used by the world’s four largest publicly-traded tobacco companies. Japan Tobacco International appears to send large dividends and interest payments straight back to its parent company in Japan. <ref name="BATH"> University of Batch, [https://web.archive.org/web/20201207072922/https://www.bath.ac.uk/announcements/big-tobacco-big-avoidance/ Big Tobacco, Big Avoidance], 5 November 2020, Accessed 7 December 2020 </ref>
 
New research co-authored by University of Bath details tax avoidance tactics used by the world’s four largest publicly-traded tobacco companies. Japan Tobacco International appears to send large dividends and interest payments straight back to its parent company in Japan. <ref name="BATH"> University of Batch, [https://web.archive.org/web/20201207072922/https://www.bath.ac.uk/announcements/big-tobacco-big-avoidance/ Big Tobacco, Big Avoidance], 5 November 2020, Accessed 7 December 2020 </ref>
  
Japan Tobacco International Singapore was fined SGD 15,000 in February 2020 for distributing cigarettes at an outdoors electronic music festival without a licence. Japan Tobacco International one of the sponsors of Ultra 2016, had come to an agreement with organisers of the music festival to provide two booths with menus stating the range of cigarettes it had. Staff manning the booth would then take orders from partygoers and buy cigarettes from a 7-Eleven store nearby. <ref>[https://web.archive.org/save/https://sg.news.yahoo.com/cigarette-maker-fined-15-k-for-distributing-advertising-products-at-music-festival-without-licence-044859010.html  Cigarette maker fined $15k for distributing, advertising products at music festival without licence], ''Yahoo!'', 21 February 2020, Accessed 15 March 2020</ref>
+
Japan Tobacco International Singapore was fined SGD 15,000 in February 2020 for distributing cigarettes at an outdoors electronic music festival without a licence. Japan Tobacco International one of the sponsors of Ultra 2016, had come to an agreement with organisers of the music festival to provide two booths with menus stating the range of cigarettes it had. Staff manning the booth would then take orders from partygoers and buy cigarettes from a 7-Eleven store nearby. <ref>[https://sg.news.yahoo.com/cigarette-maker-fined-15-k-for-distributing-advertising-products-at-music-festival-without-licence-044859010.html  Cigarette maker fined $15k for distributing, advertising products at music festival without licence], ''Yahoo!'', 21 February 2020, Accessed 15 March 2020</ref>
  
Japan Tobacco International Korean unit has resolved a labor-management dispute over wages and working conditions after nearly three years of negotiation, signing an agreement with the union. The agreement will guarantee wage increases that exceed inflation rates over the next three years until 2021. The company will also provide student funds for employees' children from kindergarten to university. <ref>[https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/tech/2019/12/694_279729.html JTI Korea resolves 3-year disputes with union], ''Korea Times'', 3 December 2019, Accessed 20 January 2020 </ref>
+
Japan Tobacco International Korean unit has resolved a labor-management dispute over wages and working conditions after nearly three years of negotiation, signing an agreement with the union. The agreement will guarantee wage increases that exceed inflation rates over the next three years until 2021. The company will also provide student funds for employees' children from kindergarten to university. <ref>[https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/tech/2019/12/694_279729.html JTI Korea resolves 3-year disputes with union], ''Korea Times'', 3 December 2019, Accessed 20 January 2020 </ref>
  
The US House of Representatives committee has asked e-cigarette manufacturers to hand over details about the health impact of products, heaping renewed scrutiny on the popular devices. The energy and commerce committee wrote to Fontem Ventures, a subsidiary of [[Imperial Brands]], the tobacco manufacturer, which owns the Blu vaping brand, Reynolds American, the US business of [[British American Tobacco]], [[Japan Tobacco International]] and Juul. <ref> [https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/business/e-cigarette-brands-quizzed-by-house-of-representatives-over-risk-to-young-smokers-56d62hdgf E-cigarette brands quizzed by House of Representatives over risk to smokers], ''The Times'', 23 August 2019, Accessed 12 September 2019 </ref>
+
The US House of Representatives committee has asked e-cigarette manufacturers to hand over details about the health impact of products, heaping renewed scrutiny on the popular devices. The energy and commerce committee wrote to Fontem Ventures, a subsidiary of [[Imperial Brands]], the tobacco manufacturer, which owns the Blu vaping brand, Reynolds American, the US business of [[British American Tobacco]], [[Japan Tobacco International]] and Juul. <ref> [https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/business/e-cigarette-brands-quizzed-by-house-of-representatives-over-risk-to-young-smokers-56d62hdgf E-cigarette brands quizzed by House of Representatives over risk to smokers], ''The Times'', 23 August 2019, Accessed 12 September 2019 </ref>
  
Japan Tobacco International was listed amongst 59 foreign companies that have joint ventures or other commercial ties with military-owned firms. New UN report states these firms "risk contributing to, or being linked to, violations of international human rights and humanitarian law”. <ref>[https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/8/6/un-calls-for-sanctions-arms-embargo-against-myanmar-army Calls sanctions arms embargo Myanmar army], ''Al Jazeera'', 6 August 2019, Accessed 9 August 2019</ref>
+
Japan Tobacco International was listed amongst 59 foreign companies that have joint ventures or other commercial ties with military-owned firms. New UN report states these firms "risk contributing to, or being linked to, violations of international human rights and humanitarian law”. <ref>[https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/08/calls-sanctions-arms-embargo-myanmar-army-190806011519378.html Calls sanctions arms embargo Myanmar army], ''Al Jazeera'', 6 August 2019, Accessed 9 August 2019</ref>
  
According to the Independent, [[British American Tobacco]], [[Imperial Brands]], Japan Tobacco International and [[Philip Morris International]] have all shifted their corporate structures to minimise their tax bills in the United Kingdom, researchers from the University of Bath found. Despite being headquartered in Britain, Imperial Brands paid an effective rate of just 13 per cent over the past seven years, during which corporation tax has varied between 20 per cent and 28 per cent. British American Tobacco is also based in the UK but paid “virtually no” corporation tax over the same period, including four consecutive years (2011-14) where it paid nothing at all, the paper found. <ref> [https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/tobacco-companies-uk-corporation-tax-profits-university-bath-study-a8764841.htmlTobacco companies uk corporation tax profits university bath study], ''Independent'', 16 February 2019, Accessed 23 April 2019 </ref>
+
According to the Independent, [[British American Tobacco]], [[Imperial Brands]], Japan Tobacco International and [[Philip Morris International]] have all shifted their corporate structures to minimise their tax bills in the United Kingdom, researchers from the University of Bath found. Despite being headquartered in Britain, Imperial Brands paid an effective rate of just 13 per cent over the past seven years, during which corporation tax has varied between 20 per cent and 28 per cent. British American Tobacco is also based in the UK but paid “virtually no” corporation tax over the same period, including four consecutive years (2011-14) where it paid nothing at all, the paper found. <ref> [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/tobacco-companies-uk-corporation-tax-profits-university-bath-study-a8764841.html Tobacco companies uk corporation tax profits university bath study], ''Independent'', 16 February 2019, Accessed 23 April 2019 </ref>
  
 
===Tobacco Litigation===
 
===Tobacco Litigation===
Japan Tobacco International has removed its gantries from three retailers’ stores in the United kingdom after they were convicted of selling illegal tobacco. The removal of gantries from NJ Food & Wine in Staines, Kenton Superstores in Harrow and KS News in Bilston took the total number of gantries removed to 43. <ref> [https://web.archive.org/save/https://forecourttrader.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/17926/JTI_removes_gantries_from_three_stores_for_selling_illicit_tobacco.html JTI removes gantries from three stores for selling illicit tobacco], ''FORECOURT Trader'', 8 January 2020, Accessed 19 February 2020 </ref>
+
Japan Tobacco International has removed its gantries from three retailers’ stores in the United kingdom after they were convicted of selling illegal tobacco. The removal of gantries from NJ Food & Wine in Staines, Kenton Superstores in Harrow and KS News in Bilston took the total number of gantries removed to 43. <ref> [https://forecourttrader.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/17926/JTI_removes_gantries_from_three_stores_for_selling_illicit_tobacco.html JTI removes gantries from three stores for selling illicit tobacco], ''FORECOURT Trader'', 8 January 2020, Accessed 19 February 2020 </ref>
  
A Canadian court has upheld the bulk of a decision that ordered three tobacco companies to pay billions in damages. The judgment involves class action suits that were consolidated against Imperial Tobacco Canada, [[Philip Morris International|Rothmans Benson & Hedges]] and [[Japan Tobacco International|JTI-MacDonald]]. <ref>[https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47409916 Canada appeals court orders tobacco firms to pay billions in damages], ''BBC'', 1 March 2019, Accessed 12 April 2019 </ref> An Ontario court extended an order suspending legal proceedings until March 31, 2021.
+
A full list of tobacco industry litigation cases can be found [https://takeapartwiki.tobaccofreekids.org/index.php?title=Tobacco_Control_Litigation here].
 +
 
 +
A Canadian court has upheld the bulk of a decision that ordered three tobacco companies to pay billions in damages. The judgment involves class action suits that were consolidated against Imperial Tobacco Canada, [[Philip Morris International|Rothmans Benson & Hedges]] and [[Japan Tobacco International|JTI-MacDonald]]. <ref>[https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47409916 Canada appeals court orders tobacco firms to pay billions in damages], ''BBC'', 1 March 2019, Accessed 12 April 2019 </ref> An Ontario court extended an order suspending legal proceedings until March 31, 2021. <ref>[https://www.kamloopsthisweek.com/news/ontario-court-again-extends-stay-of-proceedings-for-three-tobacco-giants-1.24211784 Ontario court again extends stay of proceedings for three tobacco giants], ''Kamloops This week'', 29 September 2020, Accessed 19 November 2020</ref>
 +
 
 +
In 2016, Japan Tobacco International and Others v. Ministry of Health (plain packaging laws), Japan Tobacco International, [[Philip Morris International]], [[British American Tobacco]] and others brought six legal challenges against France's plain packaging regulations. The Conseil d’Etat (the highest administrative jurisdiction in France) dismissed all six challenges, holding that to the extent there is any infringement of property rights, the infringement is justified by the public health objective.
 +
 
 +
In 2015, Japan Tobacco International Ireland told Irish Ministers James Reilly and Leo Varadkar that it will take legal action if they fail to promise that no further steps will be taken to enact the draft plain packaging law. <ref> [https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/tobacco-giant-issues-legal-threat-over-plain-packaging-1.2106300 Tobacco giant issues legal threat over plain packaging], ''The Irish Times'', 17 February 2015, Accessed 29 December 2018 </ref>
 +
 
 +
In 2014, Japan Tobacco International (Thailand) v. Minister of Public Health, Japan Tobacco challenged a requirement of 85 percent pack warnings. The Supreme Administrative Court found that the requirements are not outside the intended scope of the tobacco control law and allowed implementation of the pack warnings while the case is ongoing. Japan Tobacco challenged a requirement of 85 percent pack warnings. The Supreme Administrative Court found that the requirements are not outside the intended scope of the tobacco control law and allowed implementation of the pack warnings while the case is ongoing.
 +
 
 +
In 2012, Japan Tobacco International SA v. Commonwealth of Australia, Tobacco companies challenged the constitutionality of a law requiring "plain" packaging of tobacco products, including large pictorial health warnings. The High Court upheld the constitutionality of the law. The Court ruled that although the government had "taken" the property of the tobacco companies, there had been no "acquisition" because neither the Government nor any third party acquired any benefit as a result.
  
 
==Partners and Allies==
 
==Partners and Allies==

Please note that all contributions to TakeApartWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see TakeApartWiki:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)