Editing Philip Morris International
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 932: | Line 932: | ||
====Australia==== | ====Australia==== | ||
The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration rejected an application from Philip Morris International, which would have allowed the sale of heated tobacco products, a smoke-free product that heats tobacco rather than burning it, said to result in a significant reduction in the number and levels of harmful chemicals emitted compared to cigarette smoke. <ref>[https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/lifestyle/health/heated-tobacco-australia-tga-rejects-application-from-philip-morris/news-story/ba487dc10d09a1c0b6f4a30b518b496e Heated tobacco Australia: TGA rejects application from Philip Morris], ''Adelaide Now'', 24 August 2020, Accessed 24 August 2020 </ref> | The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration rejected an application from Philip Morris International, which would have allowed the sale of heated tobacco products, a smoke-free product that heats tobacco rather than burning it, said to result in a significant reduction in the number and levels of harmful chemicals emitted compared to cigarette smoke. <ref>[https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/lifestyle/health/heated-tobacco-australia-tga-rejects-application-from-philip-morris/news-story/ba487dc10d09a1c0b6f4a30b518b496e Heated tobacco Australia: TGA rejects application from Philip Morris], ''Adelaide Now'', 24 August 2020, Accessed 24 August 2020 </ref> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
====Hungary==== | ====Hungary==== |